Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://csirspace.foodresearchgh.site/handle/123456789/393
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWallace, P. A.-
dc.contributor.authorMarfo, E. K.-
dc.contributor.authorPlahar, W. A.-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-18T09:26:21Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-18T09:26:21Z-
dc.date.issued1998-
dc.identifier.citationFood Chemistry, 61 (3), 287-291en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://csirspace.foodresearchgh.site/handle/123456789/393-
dc.description.abstractThe leaves of Xanthosomas mafaffa, Ipomoea involucrata, Launaea taxaracifolia and Euphorbia hirta were analysed for their nutritive value and antinutritional factors. Protein content of the leaves ranged between 2.60 and 3.42%, while fibre and mineral (ash) contents were 1.15–7.73% and 1.48–2.86%, respectively. The amino acid spectrum revealed that the leaf proteins were generally deficient in more than one amino acid. Methionine was the most limiting amino acid in X. mafaffa, E. hirta and L. taxaracifolia, while lysine was most limiting in I. involucrata. The highest chemical score was recorded for the E. hirta protein while L. taxaracifolia registered the lowest scores. Therefore, L. taxaracifolia leaf protein was the poorest in quality. E. hirta leaves contained the highest concentration of calcium (175 mg%), copper (14.7 mg%), iron (45.8 mg%) and lead (26.4 mg%). A high level of phosphorus (34.1 mg%) was observed in I. involucrata. In terms of antinutritional principles, all the leaves studied had comparatively lower concentrations of oxalate, phytate, tannins, alkaloids and saponinsen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Ltden_US
dc.subjectLeafy vegetablesen_US
dc.subjectNutritional qualityen_US
dc.subjectAntinutritional compositionen_US
dc.titleNutritional quality and antinutritional composition of four non-conventional leafy vegetablesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.journalnameFood Chemistry-
Appears in Collections:Food Research Institute

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FC_61_3_Wallace_et al.pdf
  Restricted Access
3.58 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in CSIRSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.